ShopDreamUp AI ArtDreamUp
Deviation Actions
there was only two entries Incurable Burn by Aurgelmir27 and Checkmate by thenobletheif. lets talk:
Checkmate by thenobletheif: concept, good. idea nice... cost of spell, lets talk: door of nothingness is a card which cost 5 which enters tapped, then you pay the same mana as checkmate to make one player lost the game. even in my eyes of mana creaps, this would still be too broken.
Incurable Burn by Aurgelmir27: basic and normal. something i was expecting but maybe without the counter. but i understand the reasoning.
the winner is Incurable Burn by Aurgelmir27.
Checkmate by thenobletheif: concept, good. idea nice... cost of spell, lets talk: door of nothingness is a card which cost 5 which enters tapped, then you pay the same mana as checkmate to make one player lost the game. even in my eyes of mana creaps, this would still be too broken.
Incurable Burn by Aurgelmir27: basic and normal. something i was expecting but maybe without the counter. but i understand the reasoning.
the winner is Incurable Burn by Aurgelmir27.
Maybe I shouldn't be so hard on you guys...
So, nearly a year since Tommo999 (https://www.deviantart.com/tommo999) accidentally killed the contests, which seemed to be most of activity for this group. Anyways, War of the Spark's Release Notes just dropped, and I found an example of the weird corner cases the rules have to adjudicate and how not to handle them. The reason for the subject title is that I found the latter in the former. Let me explain.
Here's a bullet from the card-specific notes for Bond of Passion:
"•In some rare cases, gaining control of the target creature may cause the second target to become illegal. As long as the second target is a legal target as Bond of Passion begins to resolve, before the
July Contest lets DO THIS
So this idea i think has NEVER happened and i want to give people a go. the challenge is simple;
I made a keyword for a set that i have been slowly building. and thought im about half way i have done MOST of the vampires i wanted to do and have finished using keywords that i was using, its now the basic balancing and basic cards that just fit in the set. so i wanna see what YOU guys would do with these keywords i used in my set(you only need to put 1 on the card but more can be on it):
1: Vampized
{param1}: If this creature isn’t a vampire, change the text of this creature by replacing all instances of one creature type with Vampire.
June Winner
And the winner with the only entry is ~Tommo999 (https://www.deviantart.com/tommo999).
Only make a comments:
Lian & Holder woulb be only use the ability "Partener" instead "Partener with ..." .
June Contest Partner
Thank you ~HeraldOfOpera (https://www.deviantart.com/heraldofopera) for choosing me as the winner of the previous month.
This month for the premiere of battlebond, the theme of the June contest will be "Partner".
Create a legendary card with partner equal to comander 2016 or a non-legendary card with "partner with" as in battlebond.
Extra points if they manage to make a non-creature card that uses any of these mechanics.
Notes.
The title of the letter should indicate who participates in this month, if this is not included, it will not be taken into account.
Give credit to the artist of the illustration (can be in the letter or as a link in the comment box). Otherwise, I will n
Featured in Groups
© 2016 - 2024 MtG-CustomCards
Comments1
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Short and simple, I suppose. I'll be posting the next contest tomorrow at the latest, I think.